Certain similarities exist between the ponds formed on the centre and the periphery of polygons, but also many noteworthy differences. Both types
of ponds are relatively rich in nutrients and present greater biological activity in comparison with arctic lakes of the region: estimates range from
10 to 50 times more active in the summer. Ponds in the centre of polygons have a more alkaline pH, due to the high photosynthetic activity of cyanobacteria
(thick algal formations in bottoms of ponds that feed zooplankton). Ponds on the periphery of polygons are more turbid and contain a greater quantity of
phosphorus and dissolved organic carbon. Further, the dissolved organic carbon in these ponds is more coloured (data not presented in the table), which
greatly reduces the amount of light reaching bottom, and consequently reduces both algal photosynthetic activity and water temperature. This disparity
between the two types of ponds is due to peripheral ponds being exposed to a much more active erosive process, increasing their turbidity and decreasing
their transparency to incident light.
Both types of thaw ponds are supersaturated with CH4 in summer: the water concentration is greater than the air. This is due to the effects of microbial respiration,
especially that at the bottom of the ponds, where oxygen is rare. Peripheral ponds are also supersaturated with CO2 in most cases during summer, again due to microbial
respiration, but in this case in the presence of oxygen. However, the ponds in the centres of the polygons are under-saturated in CO2: concentration in the water is
less than that in the air. This under-saturation is caused by the elevated photosynthetic activity of cyanobacterial mats, which uses up the CO2 in the same way as
plants and trees. Photolysis of dissolved organic carbon is another phenomena that can generate CO2 in water. This non-biological process is caused solely by the sun
radiation (in particular ultraviolet rays), and brings about a decomposition of complex molecules into smaller molecules, including CO2.
And so this begs the question: are these thaw ponds sinks or sources of greenhouse gaz? And which carbon source is used by the microbes that produce greenhouse gaz? Climate implications are entirely different, depending on
whether the carbon comes from that previously stored in tundra soil, or if it comes from carbon recently fixed by plants in the catchment.
As mentioned earlier, there are processes that increase greenhouse gaz in the water and other that generate losses of greenhouse gaz. Gains are microbial respiration (which generates CO2 directly, or initially CH4, which
can then be oxidized as CO2) and photolysis of dissolved organic carbon (which generates CO2). Losses are photosynthesis, which transforms CO2 into oxygen, and methanotrophy, which oxidizes CH4 into CO2.
Gas concentrations at a given time will express the sum of the gains and losses of the gas in question. When a gas is in excess in a body of water, it has a tendency to equilibrate with the air above
(by diffusion), which creates a positive flux towards the atmosphere (positive flux values in the preceding table), and vice versa. These fluxes are however greatly increased by wind, which causes turbulence
and mixing of water: the greater the wind speed, the greater the fluxes (if gains are high enough). Greenhouse gaz fluxes can be measured using a floating chamber attached to an infrared gas analyzer.
Results so far suggest that while the ponds in the centre of the polygons are CO2 sinks, they remain CH4 sources, whereas ponds on the periphery are sources for both CO2 and CH4.
However, depending on the specific biological characteristics of certain ponds (for example, the composition of microbial and algal community, which varies according
to the pond's physicochemical properties), a CO2 flux inversion can be observed within the same day. We saw this in a peripheral pond that had been colonized by aquatic
plants instead of a cyanobacterial mat: photosynthetic activity and microbial respiration influenced gas concentrations, and followed a diurnal cycle (see figure below).
Even when under-saturation of CO2 occurred (at the end of the day, where the curve crosses the dashed bar which approximately corresponds to CO2 saturation of the water),
most of the time the pond is supersaturated and overall remains a carbon source to the atmosphere. In parallel, we observed fluctuations of dissolved oxygen in the water,
resulting from aquatic plant activity.
For more details on the instrument used to measure CO2 and O2, please refer to Bastien et al. (2008).